"You can't submit that!" said a colleague. Good advice is seldom taken. This is what was handed in.
Written
Assignment- to reflect on yourself as a teacher
Part 1
When I first came across Bob he showed an interest in me as
a person. Not often do teachers bother. He asked
relevant questions and was patient listening to my answers. He made me laugh as
he was funny without any hint of malice.
His first lesson with us lasted only 20 minutes. He was very
confident in front of the class and he explained 7 different tenses from a text
in the book. I tried to understand but it was not easy.
The next lesson involved us listening to a text. Bob realised we did not fully understand and
was smart enough to play it for a third time. It was a shame that nobody had
heard of the film we were supposed to give the answer to. I cannot blame Bob
for that.
The lesson I remember most clearly was the murder mystery
role play. It looked very exciting. However, we found it difficult to get the
meaning of the three tenses we were supposed to understand. Nobody had ever put
3 tenses to me before. Bob realised we did not get the correct usage so gave us
some drills. It was such a shame as we had devised a brilliant script. I was
really motivated to produce my best English ever.
I was sad to see the groups change as I felt happy to be
taught by him. He would always ask if we knew the answers and let us work on
our own if we did not like our partner. Towards the end of our time together I
noticed a furrowed brow appear and a lot of happiness disappear.
He now teaches my mother and she adores being in his class.
However, he did make her study a text about schools in Ireland. There were ridiculously hard phrases and
things happen in Irish schools that do not in Bulgaria. She wondered why they
were given it.
Part 2
Having come from a mainstream UK secondary schools teaching
background, I had a different philosophy regarding the role of the teacher. In
the very tough schools the teacher would be trampled upon by the students if
certain techniques were implemented which would be required for a CELTA course.
A task based approach is fine if students have the extrinsic or intrinsic
motivation to learn. Nobody has mentioned how to deal with the problems of
disruptive learners.
My teacher talking time was perhaps my biggest problem at
the start of the course, along with echoing. I have been told I have remedied
these problems. My explanations are short and sweet and, even if the students
do not understand, they will eventually. I have changed my philosophy regarding
echoing as I did not believe that it necessarily ate into student talking time.
However, as students would tend to listen only to the teacher’s response and
not their peers, I have eliminated echoing.
Lesson planning has been a problem for me since the early
70’s. I can reflect and pinpoint exact areas where lessons have not flowed due
to plans not being adequate. However, the blame cannot lie solely with a
trainee. Cambridge University are of the misguided opinion that the more
intense the course the better. This is clearly not the case. We are required to
pre-teach students, yet no access to the written assignments is permitted,
despite the fact they are easily available to buy on the internet.
Were I to have the chance to teach my lessons again I would
make ‘what if’ flexi-planning. This would allow greater freedom for students not
understanding or taking longer than expected.
I would avoid so much monitoring of students’ faces, thereby
my teacher talking time would be reduced.
I have tended become entrenched in long explanations. This has eaten into the time allocated for my
production stages. The rules of the game have become clear.
I need to make my lessons more student based, giving
students the opportunity to be responsible for their own learning. I,
personally, became disillusioned with the input sessions and just sat and waited
for the Celta way it should be done, realising very early that my opinion was
not important.
Heartily agree. So, did this pass?
ReplyDelete